Improve threshold calculation in ROC, DET, and Precision and Recall plots

Fixes #58 (closed) and #60 (closed)

added 1 commit

• 7f3504dd - Improve accuracy of ROC (and DET) plots

Compare with previous version

changed the description

With this merge request, ROC's will look sth like this:

Not very eye pleasing but at least the dots fall on the plots!

Before it used to look like this:

added 1 commit

• 955af965 - Improve accuracy of ROC, DET, and PR plots

Compare with previous version

resolved all discussions

changed title from Roc fixes to Improve threshold calculation in ROC, DET, and Precision and Recall plots

added 1 commit

• 868a13b2 - Improve accuracy of ROC, DET, and PR plots

Compare with previous version

added 1 commit

• 17628ba9 - Improve accuracy of ROC, DET, and PR plots

Compare with previous version

resolved all discussions

This is ready for review.

added 1 commit

• 7f251905 - Improve accuracy of ROC, DET, and PR plots

Compare with previous version

added 1 commit

• 5ed0b6f3 - Improve accuracy of ROC, DET, and PR plots

Compare with previous version

resolved all discussions

Hi @bob I am changing the way thresholds are computed for roc, det, and precision_recall curves. They look more like staircases now compared to smooth (interpolated) lines that they were before. Please test this branch and do some plots with bob bio roc or bob pad roc or their equivalent det commands and compare the changes and let me know what do you think please.

mentioned in merge request bob.pad.base!63 (merged)

I will check this out this week

assigned to @tiago.pereira

@tiago.pereira could you please merge this?

I didn't even had time to look at it.

I will merge it as soon as I review it

JUst give me some time

@tiago.pereira I am going to merge this to get people to test this either while it's beta or after it's released.

mentioned in commit eeed95c2

merged

mentioned in merge request bob.learn.em!36 (closed)