- Oct 05, 2016
-
- Oct 04, 2016
-
-
Amir MOHAMMADI authored
Point to gitlab pages, remove conda installations instructions See merge request !45
-
Amir MOHAMMADI authored
-
Amir MOHAMMADI authored
-
Amir MOHAMMADI authored
-
- Oct 03, 2016
-
-
Manuel Günther authored
Make sure default value is not a pointer See merge request !44
-
Amir Mohammadi authored
-
Manuel Günther authored
Made the default for --result-directory and --temp-directory more obvious that it is **not** the real path, see /scratch/mgunther/test_checkouts/bob.bio.caffe/caffe/bin/caffe 'train' --solver=solver.prototxt -log_dir '.' -snapshot 1e-4/snapshots_iter_50000.solverstate , fixes #43
-
Manuel Günther authored
This reverts commit 927f30ef.
-
Amir MOHAMMADI authored
Revert "Fixed a bug when there is no argument called env" *Created by: siebenkopf* Reverts bioidiap/bob.bio.base#18 Please revert the PR as soon as it is possible. See merge request !21
-
Amir MOHAMMADI authored
Pre release Documenting and fixing warnings and closes #41 See merge request !42
-
Manuel Günther authored
Removed the superflouos original_data_list_files from the FileSelector and updated preprocessor accordingly
-
- Oct 02, 2016
-
-
Tiago de Freitas Pereira authored
-
- Sep 29, 2016
-
-
Manuel Günther authored
-
- Sep 28, 2016
-
-
André Anjos authored
-
André Anjos authored
Fixes #33 I am now checking that the ``--group`` and according options are not used w/o ``--sub-task``. A test case is yet missing, but will follow soon. Note that I will need to modify ``bob.bio.gmm`` accordingly, unless someone finds a better and more generic solution to #33 Accepting this merge will close #33. See merge request !34
-
André Anjos authored
Resolve "Confusing defaults documentation on bob.bio.base scripts" Closes #26 See merge request !40
-
-
André Anjos authored
-
-
- Sep 20, 2016
-
-
Tiago de Freitas Pereira authored
Solving Issue #38 - BioDatabase method training_files causes tests to fail See merge request !39
-
Tiago de Freitas Pereira authored
-
- Sep 16, 2016
-
-
Tiago de Freitas Pereira authored
Issue 8 remove database configuration Solving issue #37 (some database tests are missing) See merge request !38
-
Tiago de Freitas Pereira authored
Merge branch 'issue-8-remove-database-configuration' of gitlab.idiap.ch:bob/bob.bio.base into issue-8-remove-database-configuration
-
Tiago de Freitas Pereira authored
[refactoring2016] Moved from bob.bio.db to bob.bio.base the scripts that test the hight level implementations
-
- Sep 15, 2016
-
-
Manuel Günther authored
-
Tiago de Freitas Pereira authored
Issue 8 remove database configuration This merge request sediments what we have discussed along the week. Basically I removed bob.bio.db package and move the BioDatabase and BioFile classes to bob.bio.base. I will branch the bob.nightlies to better do the integration tests. I will leave this merge request open, just to not forget See merge request !37
-
Tiago de Freitas Pereira authored
Merge branch 'issue-8-remove-database-configuration' of gitlab.idiap.ch:bob/bob.bio.base into issue-8-remove-database-configuration
-
Tiago de Freitas Pereira authored
-
Tiago de Freitas Pereira authored
[refactoring2016] Merged 29-preprocessor-does-not-use-the-load-method-of-the-biofile-class with issue-8-remove-database-configuration
-
Tiago de Freitas Pereira authored
-
Tiago de Freitas Pereira authored
-
Tiago de Freitas Pereira authored
-
-
Updated name of load_function to be read_original_data (to be consistent with the name of the function); used BioFile.load instead of bob.db.base.File.load as default.
-
-
-
This reverts commit 11a7e229.
-
This reverts commit 36b4b243.
-
- Sep 14, 2016
-
-
Manuel Günther authored
Suggests configuration file should be the default "way" with `verify.py` In this merge request, the idea is we emphasize people should rather use configuration files with `verify.py`. The change is minor, but allows users to run the script issuing: ```sh $ ./bin/verify.py -vv <my-config> ``` I mark it as a work-in-progress, because I still wanted to have `<my-config>` to optionally be a resource. @mguenther: could you please make so? I'm not sure I'm capable of doing this with ruining something else. This will allow us to distribute baselines inside packages, w/o requiring users to know where they are installed. See merge request !36
-