Skip to content

  • Projects
  • Groups
  • Snippets
  • Help
    • Loading...
    • Help
    • Support
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in
bob.pad.base
bob.pad.base
  • Project overview
    • Project overview
    • Details
    • Activity
    • Releases
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
  • Issues 5
    • Issues 5
    • List
    • Boards
    • Labels
    • Milestones
  • Merge Requests 2
    • Merge Requests 2
  • CI / CD
    • CI / CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • CI / CD
    • Repository
    • Value Stream
  • Members
    • Members
  • Collapse sidebar
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
  • bob
  • bob.pad.basebob.pad.base
  • Issues
  • #16

Closed
Open
Opened Feb 12, 2018 by Guillaume HEUSCH@heusch
  • Report abuse
  • New issue
Report abuse New issue

Harmonisation of classification algorithms

Apparently, the same algorithms are implemented in both bob.pad.face and bob.pad.voice. For instance, we have VideoLRPadAlgorithm in face and LogRegrAlgorithm in voice.

I totally understand that they are a bit different (feature normalization in one case, PCA in the other for instance), but at the core, both are supposed to do Logistic Regression on some features useful for PAD. It would then be nice to have a base class in bob.pad.base. (and then you're free to do whatever you want in a derived class if you need to).

The same goes for GMM ...

@pkorshunov @amohammadi @onikisins @ageorge @andre.anjos @sbhatta : what do you think ? Who's willing / available to take care of this ? (I can, starting on March 5th)

Thanks

Assignee
Assign to
None
Milestone
None
Assign milestone
Time tracking
None
Due date
None
0
Labels
None
Assign labels
  • View project labels
Reference: bob/bob.pad.base#16